New Delhi. Referring to about 57 lakh pending cases in the High Courts, the Supreme Court has made a decision to pave the way for the appointment of retired judges of the High Courts as temporary judges for a period of two to three years. Implemented the ‘defunct’ constitutional provision to reduce the number of pending cases. The court also said that the appointment of former judges as temporary judges will not be done in place of regular judges.
Article 224A of the Constitution, used only in rare condition, provides for the appointment of temporary judges in the High Courts. It states, “The Chief Justice of the High Court of a State may, with the prior approval of the President at any time, act as a Judge of the High Court of the State to any person holding the post of a Judge in that Court or any other High Court.” Can request for.
A bench of Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justice SK Kaul and Justice Suryakant issued guidelines related to these issues. These issues include tenure, appointment process, salary, maximum number of such judges and their role.
The Chief Justice wrote a 37-page judgment on the PIL of the NGO ‘Lok Prahari’. In order to reduce the number of pending cases in the PIL, a request has been made to appoint temporary judges in the High Courts under Article 224A. The petition has sought a report from the Ministry of Law and Justice on how the appointments have progressed. is. The bench said in the judgment, “However, we would also like to add that instead of regular posts of judges in the High Court, there is no purpose to appoint temporary judges (as the Supreme Court Bar Association President and Senior Advocate Vikas Singh feared Had expressed).